The flipside for law enforcement is perhaps even more scary. The, erm, other part of me says that this could cause some serious problems and harm for people, so shouldn't be allowed. The technical liberal in me says that this is fine. Now, I don't consider myself famous enough for this to be a problem -) but the possibilities are obvious. Let's say someone wanted to make me say something in direct contradiction to my normal views, then publish that. I'm honestly not sure what to think here, but do I have a right to my voice? but in today's ethic-free climate, who can tell? Developing this sort of technologies flies in the face of that, however, which makes me suspect it is being driven more by one of the spook agencies (CIA, NSA, FBI) than the DoD. military (and this is indeed ironic) has been more inclined to repect the Geneva contention (at least officially) than the civilian government. Not that the United States cares at all about the Geneva Convention, what with our history of detainming and even executing foreign nationals without ever letting them speak to their consulates, in direct violation of said Convention. If this were ever used it would be a violation of the Geneva Convention (the idea that you could use it to give fake orders to the enemy, or impersonate leaders telling their people to surrender, etc). The idea being that the US can intercept enemy radio communications and replace them with confusing or erroneous instructions, *in real-time, in the original radio operator's voice. Supposedly the DoD has had this capability for years, including in foreign languages. In the end it would probably take more memory than is practical, if it is even possible.īetter to treat these things as they are: another class of instrument. That's not even taking into account temperature and humidity. To reproduce the qualities of a piano's strings, pedal effects, soundboard and overall resonance is not easily done. It's just not there.Īcoustic instruments (including voice) are very complex beasts. I have a fairly modern (about 1.5 years old) professional digital piano and every time I use it I lament the limitations of the resonance reproduction. The synth is close, but any trained pianist can easily tell the difference. Having extensive experience with digital "pianos," I can testify that the technology to realistically produce an authentic piano sound is a long, long, long way off. There are instrument synth's that have been out for a while that actually acoustically model the instrument being synthesized, and instead of altering the frequency/amplitude of the generated noise, actually change the model's airflow, resonance, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |